|
Post by MrT on Jul 10, 2012 23:33:50 GMT -5
Any plans? I have a neutral conversion.
|
|
|
Post by phyphor on Jul 10, 2012 23:36:05 GMT -5
One kill? Going to be a long game if we can never outkill the village
|
|
|
Post by greenbarons on Jul 10, 2012 23:37:44 GMT -5
I"m vanilla
|
|
|
Post by jdarksun on Jul 10, 2012 23:40:40 GMT -5
MrT! Fancy meeting you on a mafia proboard. It has been a long time, it has.
|
|
|
Post by MrT on Jul 10, 2012 23:42:23 GMT -5
I promise I will be around this time.
This is my chance to redeem myself.
|
|
|
Post by MrT on Jul 10, 2012 23:43:19 GMT -5
Based on jdark's power I'm assuming Rysk and kime have powers too if Phyphor and Greenbarons are powerless.
|
|
|
Post by kime on Jul 11, 2012 8:28:01 GMT -5
I have the best power.
Also probabyl won't be softnetworking too much this game. Need a break haha.
|
|
|
Post by jdarksun on Jul 11, 2012 9:18:52 GMT -5
Today, my logical fallacy is appeal to probability.
If kime looks to eat the vote, I'm going to bequeath his power onto someone else. Otherwise, I will have kime inherit MrT's or REG's.
|
|
|
Post by rysk on Jul 11, 2012 9:22:07 GMT -5
Kime with that power is just ridiculous. You know he's likely to take several powers tonight. I can action seer, woo? At least it will potentially help us to find specials.
|
|
|
Post by MrT on Jul 11, 2012 9:46:11 GMT -5
OK, so kime is immune to vigs, seering, etc. so can only be killed by the vote.
I think Rysk's ability is more important than mine, so you should funnel that to kime in the event that Rysk dies,.
I think I should use my ability twice even without leads, and just save the third for when we have a known neutral.
|
|
|
Post by MrT on Jul 11, 2012 9:50:50 GMT -5
placeholder orders in
Not married to any of the picks, so change away
|
|
|
Post by kime on Jul 11, 2012 10:07:21 GMT -5
I'm betting jdarksun has an ability related to his many votes.
|
|
|
Post by greenbarons on Jul 11, 2012 10:09:12 GMT -5
Just moving this from the order thread
I don't think I like the matev kill, he self voted, which makes him look suspicous for trying to hide his vote record for day1. I think we could probally get the group vote onto him tommorow for that.
|
|
|
Post by kime on Jul 11, 2012 10:10:07 GMT -5
OK, we can switch then. Thoughts on a better target?
|
|
|
Post by greenbarons on Jul 11, 2012 10:16:55 GMT -5
I switched it to Warban for now, he hasn't done anything suspicous so he seems like a good choice.
|
|